I've had a long time to think about this - not that I'll provide an eloquent prose for my argument. Wednesday Morning, 3AM - Parsley,Sage, Rosemary & Thyme - Bridge Over Troubled Water - Still Crazy After All These Years - Graceland could easily be Simon's 5th 'best album ever' nomination. It's not fair for one man to have so much talent! Should I mention The Rhythm Of The Saints, You're The One, Surprise, So Beautiful Or So What, Stranger To Stranger? The man could own the whole top ten on that particular list.
Does Graceland hold a special place then, 30 years after its release? You bet it does!
I have the vinyl - a pure-ist..?.? Just a 14-yr old reading messages of politic and anti-apartheid sentiment into the groove. Magnificent history and politics essays written which bore absolutely no relation to what the record actually meant - what it ultimately had to say...
Then it became the basis for my 'A' Level essay which went something like 'Describe the recurring themes in a composer's work and how they develop to provide identity' or something like that. Now I'm sure the examiners were after Grieg or Strauss or the lop-eared Beethoven but what they got from me was Paul Simon's use of rhythm to tell a story and how it evolved from the early days of lift-shaft echo with Simon & Garfunkel to the reversed-bass solo in Diamonds On The Soles Of Her Shoes.
Some say that Simon hears what he likes and then steals it for himself, but we all do that, don't we? What Simon does is add his sparkle. He makes the rhythm tell the story. He does more than augment, he transforms an original thought into a wholly new identity, unrelated to its source.
You only have to listen to the 'original' source tapes on the remastered anniversary edition of this album. They do groove but they don't 'groove'. They don't have meaning. Listen in their completed song and they will talk to you. They become something more, something new.
Close your eyes, crank up the volume, put your head back and listen.
I bet you smile.