Firstly, like any great work of art, novel, poem, symphony, opera, epic film, scientific theory etc etc you need to look at this several times before being so utterly negative and dismissive!
If you don’t get the story of this film the first time, or ever, (and there is one!), then might I suggest reading the original Arthur C. Clarke novel on which this is based, called ‘The Sentinel’ - renamed '2001 A Space Odyssey' after the making of the film in 1968 - and with some inevitable revisions by Arthur C. Clarke himself, in the interests of complete clarity!
This is what a genuine Sci-Fi fan does with more intellectually challenging story lines; reads the book as well, either before or after viewing the film. The books do serve to clarify a lot of detail and ambiguity. Exactly the same is true of the original ‘Alien' novel for example, which explains a lot that the film only hints at.
But don’t be so categorically negative without informed opinion! You negative people out there are entitled to an opinion of course; but, not one of you has actually backed this opinion up properly with any real analytical detail. (Only meaningless comments like garbage! A great deal more intelligence and creativity went into Clarke’s and Kubrick’s thinking than has evidently gone into your naive, throwaway comments!)
To be fair, neither have some of the positive reviewers backed up their opinions adequately either, actually; but then, they vastly outnumber the negative opinions, and the greatness of this film has stood the test of time; and no, I am not just considering the evidence of the iTunes reviews here! Have a conversation with some informed Sci Fi experts first before you totally slam this film, research the background thoroughly etc. There are plenty of excellent books out there, including those written for GCSE, A Level and Degree Level Media/ Film Studies students (who I teach by the way!) Sci-Fi is often a set topic for such courses. Judging by some of the totally negative and ‘naive' comments, how much Sci Fi do you actually know well, I mean books as well as films?
True Sci Fi goes way deeper than the obvious story lines of the more commercial films, designed for immediate gratification without much intellectual effort being called for. True intellect and deep perception is required in order to truly understand the more esoteric offerings. Some people are just not up to it, but why don’t they just recognise their limitations instead of condemning everything they don’t actually understand, completely out of hand?
That applies to many things in life actually, not just Sci Fi. Is Shakespeare or Tolstoy rubbish just because they can’t fully grasp it? The theories of Newton, Kepler, Einstein or Hawking?
Of course not!
If you are not willing to, or indeed able to make the extra mental effort to understand the 'deep stuff', then fine; but don’t then proceed to utterly condemn it merely because ‘you' don’t get it! That’s just extremely ignorant, arrogant, naive, narrow-minded and impatient! It certainly wouldn’t score any marks in a 'Film Studies’ or any other examination!
Connected to which, in response to one negative reviewer who asks what planet we positive reviewers live on - The planet of intelligence, creativity, imagination and fairness! - What planet do you live on???
Also, in response to the “ignore the academic I’m so clever critics” comment; why should your opinion be any more valid than anyone else, particularly those who are way more informed on a topic than you clearly are? So, you don’t get the ending of the film? As I said earlier, read the book; Arthur C. Clarke makes it extremely clear what is happening every step of the way! He wrote the thing! To make Bowman feel more welcome, the aliens have created a world that is familiar and safe, to ease his demise! That is a rather simplified view, I know, but it is not rubbish; you simply don’t understand this carefully crafted ending yet!
Anyway, what is wrong with being academic know it alls? That’s why we no longer live in caves! Indeed, if you think about it, that’s what the film is actually about, our progress over millions of years, from highly primitive to highly intellectual beings!!! Think about this as you use your computer, television, smart phone or microwave oven etc etc Indeed, this film has predicted the future. Sci Fi has become Sci fact! e.g. the scene with a video link to earth - Skype? Arthur C. Clarke was a true visionary! This is just one of many examples of scientific prediction in the film.
The ‘Starchild’ at the very end of the film is symbolic too! As I say, read the book, or don’t bother; but don’t merely condemn what you don’t understand, without being willing to make the extra mental effort to at least try and get it!
Why do intellectual ‘know it alls’ annoy you so much anyway? If you’re out of your depth then swim away, or get out of the water altogether! But don’t try to push us under and drown us because of your sheer frustration that you can’t keep up!
The ending of this film is very surreal; it is meant to be! Re-read the review ‘A Masterpiece’. I agree with this reviewer completely, namely that you negative reviewers out there have completely missed the point, big time! That’s your loss, not the film’s!
Put you energy into making a way bigger intellectual effort to understand this iconic film, instead of slamming those of us who already have done! Also, compare the average length of the positive reviews and the negative ones. This speaks volumes I think about the effort put in, or not put in to writing a review on any topic!